Just what I wanted to hear Andew, thanks!
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:38 AM Akshat Jiwan Sharma < > akshatji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> A couple of times I've noticed that the capacity of a machine provisioned >> by juju is much more than what I require for my workload. I was wondering >> that if I were to manually resize the machine would it break any of juju >> services? >> > > Juju won't care, you will just have some incorrect information in "juju > status". We record hardware characteristics for each machine, but it's used > only for describing machines to the user. > > FWIW, I've just tested this: > - juju bootstrap azure --bootstrap-constraints > instance-type=instance-type=Standard_DS12_v2 > - juju switch controller && juju deploy ubuntu --to 0 > Then resized the machine to Standard_D4s_v3 via the Azure Portal. Juju > came back up fine, as did the unit. > > Some charms might take a snapshot of hardware details when they're > installed, but I'm not aware of which if any would do that. But Juju itself > doesn't care. > > Cheers, > Andrew > > >> Thanks, >> Akshat >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ >> mailman/listinfo/juju >> >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
