I really would like to be able to contribute more to the Julia community, and although I don't have as much time on my hands as I would like (who does, really...?) ODE.jl is one of quite few parts of the Julia language where I feel I have skills and competence enough to do so. However, since my time is limited and since I'm not able to use Julia in my daily work, it's difficult to know what changes are actually for the better as I'm not dogfooding <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food> it.
Please, do file issues if you find problems, or have suggestions for improvement - if possible, include a failing test case that I can use to debug - and I will take a look at it eventually (if no one else does before me, which I guess isn't a bad thing ;) ). Also, there are a couple of issues and pull requests which discuss API changes for the library, none of which have seen any activity since I last did something there, which was several months ago. If you have opinions on what would make a good ODE solver API, please do comment on those pull requests and let me know what you think. Or even better, check out those branches and give them a spin =) // Tomas On Friday, January 10, 2014 9:42:11 PM UTC+1, Jiahao Chen wrote: > > ODEs in Julia could use a lot of improvement. Do file issues! >
