Thanks :-)
On Saturday, March 1, 2014 12:17:36 AM UTC+1, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Pierre-Yves Gérardy > <pyg...@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Yes, I tried it. My specific question is about the Base.parser()behavior >> regarding integer literals: >> >> v0.3-pre/x64 produces an Int64 when it fits, and a :(@int128_str "...") >> Expr when confronted with numbers that would overflow an Int64, but fit >> an Int128. >> >> v0.2/x64 chokes on numbers that overflow Int64. >> > > Yes, support for large integer literals was added during 0.3 development. > Since it's a feature, not a bug fix, it won't be backported to the 0.2 line. > > >> What about v0.2/x86 for numbers that overflow an Int32, but fit an Int64? >> > > That has worked for a long time, well pre 0.2, so you should be fine. >
