Ok, if I look at the proto definition:

message PositionECEF {            // position of the kite in the "Earth 
Centered Earth Fixed" reference frame
  optional float latitude   = 1;  // -90.0 ..90.0,     unit="deg" 
latitude,  angular distance of the location
                                  // south or north of the Equator
  optional float longitude  = 2;  // -180.0 .. 180.0   unit="deg" 
longitude, east-west position of a point on
                                  // the Earth's surface
  optional float altitude   = 3;  // -500.0 .. 5000.0  unit="m"   altitude 
above WGS-84 elipsoid
}

message OrientationEX {       // Euler angles in earth reference frame
  required float phi   = 1;   // roll  angle, -180.0 .. 180.0,        
unit="deg"
  required float theta = 2;   // pitch angle, -90.0 ..   90.0         
unit="deg"
  required float psi   = 3;   // yaw/ heading angle, -180.0 .. 180.0, 
unit="deg" 
}
then I see that in the type OrientationEX all fields are "required", while 
in
PositionECEF they are optional. This makes sense now.

Uwe

On Sunday, March 2, 2014 6:34:10 PM UTC+1, Ivar Nesje wrote:
>
> I would guess (from the 
> README<https://github.com/tanmaykm/Protobuf.jl#protocol-buffer-metadata>) 
> that the meta line is used for metadata about the type. Probably the meta 
> function is not shown when object follows default behaviour.
>
> Ivar
>
> kl. 18:26:52 UTC+1 søndag 2. mars 2014 skrev Uwe Fechner følgende:
>>
>> Hi, if I look at the generated code, for example:
>> type PositionECEF
>>     latitude::Float32
>>     longitude::Float32
>>     altitude::Float32
>>     PositionECEF() = new()
>> end #type PositionECEF
>>
>> type OrientationEX
>>     phi::Float32
>>     theta::Float32
>>     psi::Float32
>>     OrientationEX() = new()
>> end #type OrientationEX
>> meta(t::Type{OrientationEX}) = meta(t, Symbol[:phi,:theta,:psi], Int[], 
>> Dict{Symbol,Any}())
>>
>> then I see that some type definitions are followed by a "meta" line and 
>> some are not.
>> What is the use of this "meta" line?
>>
>> Regards: Uwe
>>
>> On Saturday, March 1, 2014 8:15:19 PM UTC+1, Tanmay K. Mohapatra wrote:
>>>
>>> I have now implemented the .proto parser and code generator. Was able to 
>>> generate Julia code for the file "asset.system.proto".
>>> Do try out  https://github.com/tanmaykm/Protobuf.jl and give your 
>>> feedback.
>>> It is not yet a registered package, but shall do it in a couple of days.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tanmay
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:33:23 AM UTC+5:30, Uwe Fechner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's a good start.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps the following file could be used as test case:
>>>>
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/ufechner/freekitesim/src/1df579321570a3c7fa2c157416f7326876bb9dda/asset/asset.system.proto?at=master
>>>>
>>>> Is there already a piece of code that can parse .proto files in Julia?
>>>>
>>>> Regards:
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:09:22 PM UTC+1, Tanmay K. Mohapatra 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have started working on a pure Julia Protobuf implementation here: 
>>>>> https://github.com/tanmaykm/Protobuf.jl. It's in very early stages, 
>>>>> but I plan to focus on it for the next few weeks. I have put up a few 
>>>>> lines 
>>>>> now about how I plan to develop it in the readme. Would love to hear what 
>>>>> you think of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Tanmay
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:14:27 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Murthy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You may want to check out Tanmay's 
>>>>>> https://github.com/tanmaykm/Protobuf.jl
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Uwe Fechner <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> our control and simulation software is highly modular, and we use 
>>>>>>> google protocol buffer
>>>>>>> encoded messages over ZeroMQ sockets to communicate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the best approach to send and receive protobuf encoded 
>>>>>>> messages:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a) using one of the C bindings; there are actually three:
>>>>>>>     - http://spbc.sourceforge.net/
>>>>>>>     - http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-c/
>>>>>>>     - http://koti.kapsi.fi/jpa/nanopb/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> b) using the Python library:
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/pythontutorial
>>>>>>>     This one is officially supported by google in contrast to the C 
>>>>>>> bindings
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> c) writing a full protobuf compiler, coder and decoder in Julia 
>>>>>>> directly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any comments welcome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uwe Fechner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to