Maybe I don't understand the problem well enough, but I think that an immutable type could work pretty well. You will have to qualify your references to the members, but you only have to declare the names and types once. I think it was discussed to create default constructors with keyword arguments that correspond to the field names but I'm not sure if we have it yet. Then, you could refer to the parameters by name everywhere.
- [julia-users] Packing and unpacking parameters Yuuki Soho
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking para... Ivar Nesje
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking para... Patrick O'Leary
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking ... Yuuki Soho
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking para... Cristóvão Duarte Sousa
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking ... Toivo Henningsson
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking para... Mike Innes
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking para... Cristóvão Duarte Sousa
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking ... andrew cooke
- [julia-users] Re: Packing and unpacking para... James Porter
- Re: [julia-users] Packing and unpacking ... John Myles White
- Re: [julia-users] Packing and unpack... Cristóvão Duarte Sousa
- Re: [julia-users] Packing and un... Yuuki Soho
- Re: [julia-users] Packing a... John Myles White
- Re: [julia-users] Packi... Yuuki Soho
- Re: [julia-users] P... John Myles White
