Hmm, looking at your example more carefully, that is weird---you shouldn't need an incremental GC for that, because gc should be triggered at the next allocation. I'm getting the same thing on Linux. Want to file an issue?
--Tim On Monday, March 10, 2014 01:15:44 PM Daniel H wrote: > To me, it looks like the gc didn't kick off automatically because current > gc is expensive or maybe it's the OS or my personal settings that prevent > gc to trigger itself. > Can anyone try it on their computer and see if gc() trigger automatically? > > I guess, for now, I would call gc() manually.
