I merged the Java benchmarks, but couldn't get them to run: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6317. If anyone is a Java pro and wants to take a crack at this, that would be most appreciated.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Isaiah Norton <isaiah.nor...@gmail.com>wrote: > No. http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/manual/performance-tips/ > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Freddy Chua <freddy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I did some simple benchmark on for loop >> >> a=0 >> for i=1:1000000000 >> a+=1 >> end >> >> The C equivalent runs way faster... does that mean julia is slow on loops >> ? >> >> On Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:06:20 PM UTC+8, Isaiah wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/tree/master/test/perf >>> >>> > I also wonder why no tests were done with Java.. >>> >>> There is an open PR for Java, which you could check out and try: >>> >>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/5260 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Freddy Chua <fred...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I wonder where can I download the source code of these benchmarks, I >>>> want to try it on my own... I also wonder why no tests were done with >>>> Java.. >>>> >>>> >>>> Fortran JuliaPythonR MatlabOctaveMathe-matica JavaScriptGo gcc 4.8.10.2 >>>> 2.7.3 3.0.2R2012a 3.6.48.0V8 3.7.12.22 go1 fib0.260.9130.37 411.36 >>>> 1992.003211.81 64.462.181.03parse_int 5.031.6013.9559.40 1463.167109.85 >>>> 29.542.43 4.79quicksort1.111.14 31.98524.29101.841132.04 35.743.511.25 >>>> mandel 0.860.8514.19106.97 64.58316.956.073.49 2.36pi_sum0.801.00 16.33 >>>> 15.421.29237.41 1.320.841.41rand_mat_stat 0.641.6613.5210.84 6.6114.98 >>>> 4.523.28 8.12rand_mat_mul0.961.01 3.413.981.103.41 1.1614.608.51 >>>> >>>> >>> >
