For the best performance users are advised to write functions such that the return type is stable. And the compiler reasons out the return type, so would it be possible to have a function like isstable(f::Function) that checks whether a method is actually type stable? Or returntype(f::Function) that returns a list of possible return types?
- [julia-users] question: why no inarg specification in Jul... vavasis
- Re: [julia-users] question: why no inarg specificati... Jameson Nash
- Re: [julia-users] question: why no inarg specifi... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] question: why no inarg specificati... Mauro
- Re: [julia-users] question: why no inarg specifi... ggggg
- Re: [julia-users] question: why no inarg spe... John Myles White
- [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg specificati... vavasis
- Re: [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg spe... Stefan Karpinski
- [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg specificati... vavasis
- [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg specificati... vavasis
- Re: [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg spe... Stefan Karpinski
- [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg specifi... Tobias Knopp
- Re: [julia-users] Re: question: why no inarg... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Re: question: why no i... Stefan Karpinski