On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 4:21:49 AM UTC-5, Viral Shah wrote:
>
> Wow, better than scikit.learn? This is exciting. 
>

We are not there yet. However, the work to unify our many packages for 
regression has already been started. If we keep our paces this won't be a 
too-far-away goal.
 

>
> We should probably discuss in the roadmap issue about what infrastructure 
> we need to support large-scale distributed machine learning problems.
>
> -viral
>
> On Monday, July 21, 2014 4:08:14 AM UTC+5:30, Dahua Lin wrote:
>>
>> Please see https://github.com/JuliaStats/MLBase.jl/blob/master/NEWS.md 
>> for recent updates.
>>
>> Also the documentation is moved from Readme to a Sphinx doc 
>> <http://mlbasejl.readthedocs.org/en/latest/>
>>
>> Now we already have quite a few packages for various machine learning 
>> tasks:
>>
>> MLBase.jl <https://github.com/JuliaStats/MLBase.jl>: data preprocessing, 
>> performance evaluation, cross validation, model tuning, etc
>> Distance.jl <https://github.com/JuliaStats/Distance.jl>: metric/distance 
>> computation (including batch & pairwise computation)
>> MultivariateStats.jl <https://github.com/JuliaStats/MultivariateStats.jl>: 
>> multivariate analysis, ridge regression, dimensionality reduction
>> Clustering.jl <https://github.com/JuliaStats/Clustering.jl>: K-means, 
>> K-medoids, Affinity propagation
>> NMF.jl <https://github.com/JuliaStats/NMF.jl>:  Nonnegative matrix 
>> factorization
>>
>> In addition, we have a bunch of other packages for Regression, GLM, SVM, 
>> etc. We are now beginning to unite the efforts in this domain (see the 
>> discussion <https://github.com/JuliaStats/Roadmap.jl/issues/14> here).
>>
>> We have been making steady progress, and I believe that we will have a 
>> great machine learning ecosystem, one that is comparable or even superior 
>> to scikit.learn in not too long future.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dahua
>>
>>

Reply via email to