Ivar, thanks for this clarification; I was really under the impression that -- like for Perl and other projects -- I might never ever again hear from a Julia 0.4 version.
A question I asked got buried in another thread and never answered, so I'd like to repeat it here: Will the NEWS.md file immediately document the (disruptive or non-disruptive) changes? That would be very helpful, even if the change is withdrawn later on. Also, every NEWS entry could include a date to make it easier to follow the development. By the way, I am a bit worried about some of the names that seem to come up in a next version of Julia. For example, 'Nullable' or 'NullableArray' sound strange for me in a technical computing environment. On Friday, September 26, 2014 9:19:37 AM UTC+2, Ivar Nesje wrote: > > I think this is a too strong statement. There are definitely happening a > lot on the master (0.4-dev) branch, but it should be quite usable even > without reading the majority of Github issues. The more users we have, the > earlier concerns is raised, and the earlier we can fix them and prepare for > the final release. You should definitely avoid master on any project with a > deadline tough. > > >
