Done. See https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8643

On Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:11:40 PM UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>
> Sure. It will serve as a good place for discussion of ideas.
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Andrei Berceanu <andreib...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Ah ok, I read that as if keywords were the solution to my problem, but 
>> alas, no. Are there any design plans for this? Should I open an issue?
>>
>> //A
>>
>> On Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:05:26 PM UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>>>
>>> The Options package was developed before keywords existed.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Andrei Berceanu <andreib...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tim, what do you mean by "people have moved away from it now that we 
>>>> have keywords"? In my example I do use keywords (in fact that is the only 
>>>> thing I use), notice the ";" at the begining of each function argument 
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> //A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:33:00 PM UTC+2, Tim Holy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> While people have moved away from it now that we have keywords (for 
>>>>> some good 
>>>>> reasons), the Options.jl package might be worth a look in this 
>>>>> specific case. 
>>>>>
>>>>> --Tim 
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, October 09, 2014 03:14:52 PM Stefan Karpinski wrote: 
>>>>> > Yes, this is a major problem, but I'm not sure what the fix is. It's 
>>>>> a 
>>>>> > serious language design issue and I'm not aware of any languages 
>>>>> that have 
>>>>> > good solutions. 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Andrei Berceanu <
>>>>> andreib...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > wrote: 
>>>>> > > I often find myself passing long lists of parameters from one 
>>>>> function to 
>>>>> > > another. A simple, contrived example would be the following 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > *function fun3(; kw1 = 1, kw2 = 2, kw5 = 8, kw6 = 4)    fun2(; kw1 
>>>>> = kw1, 
>>>>> > > kw2 = kw2)endfunction fun2(; kw1 = 1, kw2 = 2)    fun1(; kw1 = 
>>>>> kw1, kw2 = 
>>>>> > > kw2)endfunction fun1(; kw1 = 1, kw2 = 2, kw3 = 3)    kw1 + kw2 + 
>>>>> > > kw3end*This results in code which is not easy to maintain. Notice 
>>>>> that 
>>>>> > > kw1 and kw2 are common to all 3 functions. Is there a way to pass 
>>>>> the two 
>>>>> > > of them (or more!) automatically? The way the code is written now, 
>>>>> if I 
>>>>> > > decide I want kw3 of fun1 to be changeable from fun3, I need to 
>>>>> change 
>>>>> > > the code in various places (in bold) -- very bug prone: 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > *function fun3(; kw1 = 1, kw2 = 2, kw5 = 8, kw6 = 4* 
>>>>> > > *, kw3=3)    fun2(; kw1 = kw1, kw2 = kw2* 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > 
>>>>> > > *, kw3=kw3)endfunction fun2(; kw1 = 1, kw2 = 2, kw3=3)    fun1(; 
>>>>> kw1 = 
>>>>> > > kw1, kw2 = kw2, kw3=kw3)endfunction fun1(; kw1 = 1, kw2 = 2, kw3 = 
>>>>> 3) 
>>>>> > > kw1 + kw2 + kw3end* 
>>>>> > > Tnx, 
>>>>> > > //A 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to