I still don't understand your sentence. Perhaps you mean: "The read-evaluate-print loop (REPL) doesn't even come close to recent versions of Julia?"
This could (probably) be fixed by integrating ipython-qtconsole with the ijulia profile. And Julia Studio 0.4.5 supports Julia 0.3 (well, currently only on windows). On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:10:38 AM UTC+1, Iain Dunning wrote: > > Sorry, mistyped, meant to say "It doesn't use an even close to recent"... > and so on. > Basically: Julia Studio is stuck (forever?) on Julia 0.2 > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Uwe Fechner <uwe.fec...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> What do you mean with "an"? >> >> >> On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:11:16 AM UTC+1, Iain Dunning wrote: >>> >>> I can't speak to your particular issue, but I strongly advise against >>> using Julia Studio. It doesn't use the an even close to recent version of >>> Julia, and isn't really been actively maintained. >>> >>> On Monday, October 27, 2014 6:09:53 PM UTC-4, Michael Wojnowicz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Even more simply, once the previous code (from my previous post) is >>>> loaded, just cutting and pasting this into Julia Studio does not seem to >>>> work. (The value for theta can be changed to 0.2 or something to observe >>>> that a change has not been made.) >>>> >>>> The problem seems to be with the white space and/or commenting. >>>> >>>> >>>> ####### Set-Up Parameters >>>> >>>> theta=rep(0.1,nfeatures); >>>> >>>> >>>> > > > -- > *Iain Dunning* > PhD Candidate > <http://orc.scripts.mit.edu/people/student.php?name=idunning> / MIT > Operations Research Center <http://web.mit.edu/orc/www/> > http://iaindunning.com / http://juliaopt.org >
