+1000 I love this package.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:48 AM, <yfrac...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's is really really exciting! > > I think, write code let me understand things, and test let me know the > code! > > > Iain Dunning於 2014年11月6日星期四UTC+8上午1時35分11秒寫道： > >> Hi all, >> >> I've just tagged FactCheck.jl v0.2 in METADATA. >> >> FactCheck was started by Zach Allaun a long long time ago in Julia terms >> (March 2013), and was one of (if not the) first testing package for Julia. >> Julia has managed to accumulate a large number of testing packages, but >> none are as widely used as FactCheck. >> However, it wasn't actively maintained anymore. >> For that reason, we have moved FactCheck to the JuliaLang org on Github, >> and I've refactored it a bit and even added some new features. >> The last pre-move, pre-refactor release was 0.1.2, and I'll bump to 0.3.x >> when new features are added. >> >> NEWS.md, for the FactCheck 0.2 release >> >> * NEW: Custom test messages, e.g. `@fact 1=>2 "two != one"` >> * NEW: Added a compact mode, enable with `FactCheck.setstyle(:compact)` >> * NEW: Added a `@pending` test type that is a no-op but records its >> existence. >> * CHANGE: Minimum Julia version bumped to 0.3 >> * CHANGE: Colored output handled by Julia itself - to get colored output run >> with `julia --color`. >> * CHANGE: `exitstatus` no longer exits Julia, instead throws an uncaught >> exception. >> * REMOVED: `irrelevant` assertion helper. >> * REMOVED: `@runtest` macro - was partially broken anyway. >> * Re-written README. Simpler, explains all features, builds up incrementally >> to more advanced options. >> * General refactoring of code base. >> >> >> I hope this encourages wider use of FactCheck, and as more people use it, >> I'm sure more feature requests/issues/PRs will come in and make it better >> for everyone. >> >> >> Finally, I don't want to say "don't make new testing packages" because there >> are different styles of testing. >> >> *But*: I'd strongly encourage people to contribute to making FactCheck >> better rather than starting their own. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Iain >> >>
