Hi Adam, I wrote "last resort" as I supposed you were relying on Anaconda for other purposes.
If the only goal for you is to get Ijulia working on windows, this solution as the advantage of working since a few months. On Thursday, November 27, 2014 9:58:44 AM UTC+1, Abram Demski wrote: > > Stonebig34, > > "If all else fails" makes me think this is a last resort. Should I be wary? > > So, this approach requires WinPython as opposed to the Anaconda install of > IPython I've currently got? (I'm not attached if there aren't any big > downsides; I used Anaconda only because the instructions for installing > IJulia said to.) > > Thanks, > > Abram > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:00 PM, <stone...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Hi Abram, >> >> If all else fails, you have still this alternative >> >> >> http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/winpython/winpython_afterdoc/blob/master/examples/installing_julia_and_ijulia.ipynb >> >> >> On Thursday, November 27, 2014 6:57:41 AM UTC+1, cdm wrote: >>> >>> >>> if you are not averse to trying IJulia in your browser, then have a look >>> at this post ... >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/ >>> tmpnb|sort:relevance/julia-users/zEp8pKkEYHk/qY7tPqrOp9gJ >>> >>> >>> there are other ways to work with IJulia on kernels hosted elsewhere; >>> let me know >>> if you are interested. >>> >>> best, >>> >>> cdm >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 3:26:51 PM UTC-8, Abram Demski wrote: >>>> >>>> Pileas, >>>> >>>> Given that I've still been unable to install IJulia, that's very >>>> helpful, thanks. >>>> >>>> > > > -- > Abram Demski > Blog: http://lo-tho.blogspot.com/ >
