Sounds like a bargain...count me in for a bottle. --Tim
On Friday, December 05, 2014 03:22:18 PM Stefan Karpinski wrote: > Make it a bottle of bourbon and we're talking. > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Jameson Nash <vtjn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll buy you a case of beer if you can close that issue > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:58 PM Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org> > > > > wrote: > >> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/265 – I'd really like to fix > >> this. > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Páll Haraldsson < > >> > >> pall.haralds...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Friday, December 5, 2014 5:25:18 PM UTC, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > >>>> There is no runtime overhead in cases where the types are known at > >>>> compile time. > >>> > >>> Be aware of one thing, say you define: > >>> > >>> f(x, y) = 1 + 2p(x)y; p(x) = 2x^2 + 1; > >>> > >>> You will get the same code even as if you defined p first. UNLESS you > >>> try to run f first by accident (or intentionally as I did). Then at > >>> compile time you get complicated assembly code (and an error). > >>> > >>> Then if you define p then f is already defined and now works and will > >>> not get reoptimized. This gives slower result in interactive. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Palli.
