https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/4964
On 11 December 2014 at 11:55, Uwe Fechner <uwe.fechner....@gmail.com> wrote: > What do you mean with TCO? > > On Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:50:19 AM UTC+1, Mike Innes wrote: >> >> It seems to me that a lot of FAQs could be answered by a simple list of >> the communities'/core developers' priorities. For example: >> >> We care about module load times and static compilation, so that's going >> to happen eventually. We care about package documentation, which is >> basically done. We don't care as much about deterministic memory management >> or TCO, so neither of those things are happening any time soon. >> >> It doesn't have to be a commitment to releases or dates, or even be >> particularly detailed, to give a good sense of where Julia is headed from a >> user perspective. >> >> Indeed, it's only the same things you end up posting on HN every time >> someone complains that Gadfly is slow. >> >> On 11 December 2014 at 03:01, Tim Holy <tim....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Really nice summaries, John and Tony. >>> >>> On Thursday, December 11, 2014 02:08:54 AM Boylan, Ross wrote: >>> > BTW, is 0.4 still in a "you don't want to go there" state for users of >>> > julia? >>> >>> In short, yes---for most users I'd personally recommend sticking with >>> 0.3. >>> Unless you simply _must_ have some of its lovely new features. But be >>> prepared >>> to update your code basically every week or so to deal with changes. >>> >>> --Tim >>> >>> >>
