Wouldn't it be good if at least the code of tutorials is MIT licensed. That way it could be used in the mostly MIT licensed packages without hassle?
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 09:31, Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org> wrote: > I'm not really sure. The Julia manual end up being MIT sort of by accident > just because it's part of the julia repo and the MIT license applies to > everything that doesn't have a different license indicated. Some CC license > may be better. > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:39 AM, David P. Sanders <dpsand...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to add a licence to my tutorial materials ( >> https://github.com/dpsanders/scipy_2014_julia) so that people can reuse >> them. >> >> Is the MIT licence suitable for this, or should I be using a Creative >> Commons one or something else instead? >> Somehow a tutorial feels different from code. (And I would not >> particularly want my material to be reused for commercial purposes.) >> >> Thanks, >> David. >>
