On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:09 AM, SVAKSHA <svak...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Ivar Nesje <iva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 3 days old version: This looks really weird, and I can't really see how this >> can happen. The first I would check is that you are actually running the >> julia you just built, rather than a a 3 days old julia from another > > Well, the make errors came after a fresh compile from the > 20a5c3d888dd9317065390b8bbd984 > 17addeb65c commit. > > Fwiw, I had deleted the old julia repo and .julia directory, cloned > julia afresh and compiled it again because the earlier commit was > showing a 3-day old master. Despite running make after doing a fresh > pull**[0] today morning it still says "Version 0.4.0-dev+2200 > (2014-12-18 17:30 UTC) Commit 79d473c (4 days old master)". Really > odd. > > >> directory. The next point on the list is to post git status and the last >> line of sh base/version_git.sh so that we can see if it gives us a clue. > > After a git pull since last night, > ~/julia$ git status > On branch master > Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 17 commits. **[0] > (use "git push" to publish your local commits) > nothing to commit, working directory clean > > **[0] NB: this is odd, when tig shows this: > https://gist.github.com/svaksha/76716563322d9065e672
Fwiw, I use the git version 2.2.1 and I'm wondering if the problem is because I updated git after the security bug issue and dont use the OS packaged version of git? It should'nt be related but I cannot put a finger on the weird git behaviour. Just thinking out loud. SVAKSHA ॥ http://about.me/svaksha ॥
