For anyone who wants to help with the test coverage issue, I just posted some instructions here: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/9493
--Tim On Monday, December 29, 2014 06:55:37 PM Ravi Mohan wrote: > Fwiw the correct engineering response here seems to be to acknowledge the > subset of Dan's criticisms that are valid/reasonable, fix those, and get > back to work. Criticising Dan's motives etc isn't a productive path (imo) > If there are low hanging fruit fixes on such a successful project,(the > build/test thing certainly seems to be one) that is a *good* thing. Yes the > HN crowd can be a bit rough (I am plinkplonk on HN, fwiw) , and often > unreasonable, but hey anyone running an open source project can't afford to > get disturbed by weird discussions on HN. > > All projects have bugs, and if someone has an uncanny knack for surfacing > heisenbugs, that is a good thing, irrespective of communication style. > > My 2 cents (I am just tinkering with Julia and don't use it anger yet, but > after some discussion with Viral (who is my neighbor) am considering > jumping in - Julia is a brilliant project). As a prospective contributor to > Julia, I am encouraged by Stefan's approach to this) > > regards, > Ravi
