On Monday, January 5, 2015 12:13:51 PM UTC-8, Jeff Bezanson wrote: > > We might be able to find a more scalable syntax for different types of > numbers. For example the syntax x@000 is available; `@ then digit` is > always a syntax error currently. >
Compared to a custom string literal (e.g. hex"1a3b7"), is the advantage that you don't have to use a closing quote?
