unfortunately I have not found time to work on Juliette so this is only a 
prototype and likely not working with newer Gtk.jl versions. But the aim 
was indeed to make an IDE for Julia.

Cheers

Tobias


Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2015 09:36:03 UTC+1 schrieb Luke Stagner:
>
> Robert,
> Although it is still under development it looks like 
> https://github.com/tknopp/Julietta.jl might be just what your looking 
> for. At the very least you should keep an eye on it. 
>
> On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 1:41:39 PM UTC-8, Robert wrote:
>>
>> Dear Mike, thanks a lot for your reply! I will study Juno again, in a 
>> couple of days when I calmed down from my frustrating 2 weeks to get 
>> started with Julia. I here would like to express to you my big THANK YOU! I 
>> really appreciate your efforts in the Juno development, and with my (only) 
>> two years of more serious programming experience (mainly MATLAB, some few 
>> Python, some few C++) I am absolutely aware about the high quality of your 
>> work.
>> My problem with Juno actually is a problem with the concept of the Light 
>> Table user interface, and not with your Juno plugin: to me it appears that 
>> you can only use LightTable effective, if you learned about a bunch of 
>> shortcuts and are able to handle in your head the work you want to do so 
>> much that you don't worry anymore about the tool (the editor) to be 
>> configured to the one or the other appearance. Like it is also with using a 
>> shell, a bash shell, or the windows command line. But if your brain (I 
>> actually speak here about _my_ brain) is not as good in abstracting and 
>> memorizing things, then a visual guidance helps a lot(!) to still get 
>> complicated tasks done. This visual guidance is missing in LightTable, 
>> subsequently is missing in Juno. It has a good reason that the graphical 
>> user interface with mouse control has been developed, and especially that 
>> it became such a success: click on a drop down menu to see what 
>> possibilities are offered by the software, call it by a click, and by time 
>> use the shortcut for that function, or rightclick somewhere for a context 
>> menu and proceed alike. Tile a tab horizontally and keep visible some 
>> example text i.e. in the upper part while typing far away in the file in 
>> the lower part of the tiled tab. Write at a place which appears at a 
>> certain position on your computer screen, and receive some ouptut always at 
>> some other certain position at the screen, without the output affecting the 
>> position on the screen where you would like to just go ahead with writing 
>> something more. That is a perfectly foreseeable and and guiding behaviour, 
>> and is what makes the other IDEs (Visual Study, Eclipse, Spyder) so 
>> successful, if not speaking about their powerful engines to take work load 
>> regarding house keeping the project and build process automation off from 
>> the user. Well, Juno at LightTable is a powerful engine as well, but the 
>> frontend of LightTable is - let´s say much different. I know that there are 
>> also the emacs and the vim users, and LightTable might be an interesting 
>> tool for those users. But there are also many people who are not so much in 
>> favour with emacs or vim, using those editors only if no other option is 
>> available, and the same people might then not be so much in favour with a 
>> LightTable based IDE neither. Although the interactive engine of Juno is 
>> impressive, I just couldn't get warm with the allover (almost) mouse-less 
>> design of LightTable and the at the same time vast amount of vertical 
>> scrolling needed. While I am absolutely aware about LightTable being an 
>> extremely powerful tool for many programmers, I still would wish to find 
>> enhanced Julia handling by a SPYDER or MATLAB alike IDE. Fortunately for 
>> LightTable liking programmers you made Juno available, and I see that it is 
>> some great work. Unfortunately nothing alike is available for SPYDER by 
>> now. 
>> O.K., I will take a break now for some days, and next week pick up again 
>> the fight for setting up a for me comfortable Julia programming environment.
>>
>

Reply via email to