[julia-users] Why X.>0 & X.<1 equal to X .> (0 & X) .< 1 rather than (X.>0) & (X.<1)?

[Jerry Xiong]

I notice that the logical operations in Julia have a different precedence 
order from R and Matlab. & and | have higher precedence than .<, .>, etc. 
For example, X.>0 & X.<1 will be parse as X .> (0 & X) .< 1 rather than 
(X.>0) & (X.<1). I think there must be a reason for this anti-intuition 
design. I just curious what it is?