> If we require a 'catch' block for every "try", it would be cleaner. > Otherwise I suggest we had a note in the documentation to state the > caveats. Particularly for those who come from other background and get too > excited about "try end" terse syntax. I would be happy to make some edits > in the documentation if you approve.
I read the docs after seeing your first post and was not any wiser. So yes, some better docs would be good, thanks!
