On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:19:26 AM UTC-4, Mauro wrote: > > approach? Would it not make sense to use `norm` instead of `abs` inside > vecnorm, as abs==norm for numbers? (If so, what should p be for the > inside norms?) >
Yes, abs -> norm in these functions would make sense, and shouldn't hurt performance for number types (where norm should inline to abs).
