Agreed about the license... I'd prefer to have a community-supported IDE
with MIT license.

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Carrera <dcarr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just had a look at Julietta:
>
> "For code conributions: As the original author of this work I want to keep
> right to spin off a commercial version of this software."
>
> :-(
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> On 14 September 2015 at 17:16, Isaiah Norton <isaiah.nor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There is a project called GtkSourceView that extends Gtk+ with a source
>>> editor
>>
>>
>> See also https://github.com/tknopp/Julietta.jl
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Carrera <dcarr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ooops, stupid question. I see that the screenshot actually shows the
>>> source code. You are using Gtk (yay!).
>>>
>>> There is a project called GtkSourceView that extends Gtk+ with a source
>>> editor with support for syntax highlighting, line numbers, and so on:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GtkSourceView/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 September 2015 at 17:00, Daniel Carrera <dcarr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good work. Which toolkit are you using to develop this? Last week I was
>>>> looking at GUI toolkits for Julia and I think that Gtk+ is the most
>>>> developed. I think that an IDE written in Julia is the right goal for the
>>>> long term.
>>>>
>>>> Is the code published somewhere? Can I have a look?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel.
>>>>
>>>> On 14 September 2015 at 15:07, <jonathan.bie...@alumni.epfl.ch> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Instead of complaining like I usually do I've been making a rough
>>>>> prototype of IDE for Julia in Julia, and it seems to me that in the long
>>>>> term
>>>>> it's the right idea. Using existing editors allow to quickly take
>>>>> advantage of their features, but past that it's really hard to integrate
>>>>> more advanced tools
>>>>> tailored specifically for the language.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also find the idea of having a Julia IDE written in Julia very
>>>>> attractive, besides the other advantages like ease of modification and the
>>>>> few dependencies needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/GHA37Ds.png
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to