I want to add my voice to the dislikers. Those are the type of surprises that are not welcome mainly for matlab users.
quarta-feira, 30 de Setembro de 2015 às 16:53:57 UTC+1, Christoph Ortner escreveu: > > I also strongly dislike the `linspace` change; I like the idea though of > having `linspace` and `linrange`, where the former should give the array. > Christoph > > > On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 10:21:36 UTC+1, Michele Zaffalon wrote: >> >> I just realize that the thread is about 0.3.11 and I am showing output >> for 0.4.0-rc2. Sorry for the noise. >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Michele Zaffalon <michele....@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat <nali...@club.fr> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Le mercredi 30 septembre 2015 à 08:55 +0200, Michele Zaffalon a écrit : >>>> > Just curious: linspace returns a Range object, but logspace returns a >>>> > vector because there is no much use case for a LogRange object? >>>> > >>>> > @feza: I have also seen the deprecation warning going away after a >>>> > couple of calls, but I am not sure why. If you restart Julia, the >>>> > deprecations reappear. >>>> Deprecation warnings are only printed once for each call place. The >>>> idea is that once you're aware of it, there's no point in nagging you. >>>> >>>> Anyway, that warning is most probably not related to linspace at all, >>>> but rather to the array concatenation syntax resulting in an effect >>>> equivalent to collect(). If you show us a piece of code that prints the >>>> warning, we can give you more details. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, you are right, I was referring to the concatenation. >>> It prints it exaclty twice if I type it in the REPL, it always prints it >>> if I define it within a function e.g. a() = [1:3]. >>> >>> C:\Users\michele.zaffalon>julia >>> _ >>> _ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to technical computing >>> (_) | (_) (_) | Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org >>> _ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "?help" for help. >>> | | | | | | |/ _` | | >>> | | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 0.4.0-rc2 (2015-09-18 17:51 UTC) >>> _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | Official http://julialang.org/ release >>> |__/ | x86_64-w64-mingw32 >>> >>> julia> [1:3] >>> WARNING: [a] concatenation is deprecated; use collect(a) instead >>> in depwarn at deprecated.jl:73 >>> in oldstyle_vcat_warning at abstractarray.jl:29 >>> in vect at abstractarray.jl:32 >>> while loading no file, in expression starting on line 0 >>> 3-element Array{Int64,1}: >>> 1 >>> 2 >>> 3 >>> >>> julia> [1:3] >>> WARNING: [a] concatenation is deprecated; use collect(a) instead >>> in depwarn at deprecated.jl:73 >>> in oldstyle_vcat_warning at abstractarray.jl:29 >>> in vect at abstractarray.jl:32 >>> while loading no file, in expression starting on line 0 >>> 3-element Array{Int64,1}: >>> 1 >>> 2 >>> 3 >>> >>> julia> [1:3] >>> 3-element Array{Int64,1}: >>> 1 >>> 2 >>> 3 >>> >>> julia> a() = [1:3] >>> a (generic function with 1 method) >>> >>> julia> a() >>> WARNING: [a] concatenation is deprecated; use collect(a) instead >>> in depwarn at deprecated.jl:73 >>> in oldstyle_vcat_warning at abstractarray.jl:29 >>> in a at none:1 >>> while loading no file, in expression starting on line 0 >>> 3-element Array{Int64,1}: >>> 1 >>> 2 >>> 3 >>> >>> julia> a() >>> WARNING: [a] concatenation is deprecated; use collect(a) instead >>> in depwarn at deprecated.jl:73 >>> in oldstyle_vcat_warning at abstractarray.jl:29 >>> in a at none:1 >>> while loading no file, in expression starting on line 0 >>> 3-element Array{Int64,1}: >>> 1 >>> 2 >>> 3 >>> >>> julia> a() >>> WARNING: [a] concatenation is deprecated; use collect(a) instead >>> in depwarn at deprecated.jl:73 >>> in oldstyle_vcat_warning at abstractarray.jl:29 >>> in a at none:1 >>> while loading no file, in expression starting on line 0 >>> 3-element Array{Int64,1}: >>> 1 >>> 2 >>> 3 >>> >>> >>>> >>>> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:40 AM, feza <moham...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > > Strange it *was* giving me an error saying deprecated and that I >>>> > > should use collect, but now it's fine. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 10:28:12 PM UTC-4, Sheehan Olver >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > fez, I'm pretty sure the code works fine without the collect: >>>> > > > when exp is called on linspace it converts it to a vector. >>>> > > > Though the returned t will be linspace object. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 12:10:55 PM UTC+10, feza >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > Here's the code I was using where I needed to use collect (I've >>>> > > > > been playing around with Julia, so any suggestions on this code >>>> > > > > for perf is welcome ;) ) . In general linspace (or the : >>>> > > > > notation) is also used commonly to lay a grid in space for >>>> > > > > solving a PDE for some other use cases. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > function gp(n) >>>> > > > > n = convert(Int,n) >>>> > > > > t0 = 0 >>>> > > > > tf = 5 >>>> > > > > t = collect( linspace(t0, tf, n+1) ) >>>> > > > > sigma = exp( -(t - t[1]) ) >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > c = [sigma; sigma[(end-1):-1:2]] >>>> > > > > lambda = fft(c) >>>> > > > > eta = sqrt(lambda./(2*n)) >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Z = randn(2*n) + im*randn(2*n) >>>> > > > > x = real( fft( Z.*eta ) ) >>>> > > > > return (x, t) >>>> > > > > end >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 8:59:52 PM UTC-4, Stefan >>>> > > > > Karpinski wrote: >>>> > > > > > I'm curious why you need a vector rather than an object. Do >>>> > > > > > you mutate it after creating it? Having linspace return an >>>> > > > > > object instead of a vector was a bit of a unclear judgement >>>> > > > > > call so getting feedback would be good. >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > On Tuesday, September 29, 2015, Patrick Kofod Mogensen < >>>> > > > > > patrick....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > > > > > > No: >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > julia> logspace(0,3,5) >>>> > > > > > > 5-element Array{Float64,1}: >>>> > > > > > > 1.0 >>>> > > > > > > 5.62341 >>>> > > > > > > 31.6228 >>>> > > > > > > 177.828 >>>> > > > > > > 1000.0 >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 8:50:47 PM UTC-4, Luke >>>> > > > > > > Stagner wrote: >>>> > > > > > > > Thats interesting. Does logspace also return a range? >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 5:43:28 PM UTC-7, Chris >>>> > > > > > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > > > > > In 0.4 the linspace function returns a range object, >>>> > > > > > > > > and you need to use collect() to expand it. I'm also >>>> > > > > > > > > interested in nicer syntax. >>>> >>> >>> >>