I have never, would never, will never, could never have worked, written, wondered, wished, anything untoward of and for Julia. Reading me, sometimes she is the what of which I wrote. Othertimes otherness. Never genderal, ever ontology in extension.
On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 6:28:35 AM UTC-5, Páll Haraldsson wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 11:14:16 AM UTC, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: >> >> where I copy/paste into julia to use her parsing algs >> > > [I'm not sure this is against the community standards (as has been > discussed).. To me this seems innocent enough, but I've been training to > say "[..] Julia and its [whatever]"..] > > On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 9:07:28 AM UTC-5, David P. Sanders wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> El lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2015, 7:58:17 (UTC-6), Stefan Karpinski >>> escribió: >>>> >>>> I think we should probably make it possible to access the full string >>>> of a numeric literal in a macro but that is a substantial change to the >>>> parser. >>>> >>> >>> That would be great. >>> >> > Yes, I would like e.g. numeric literals say 0.5 and 0.50 that get you the > *same* and precise floating point number to be accessible as a string. Then > for decimal floating point where 0.50 is not the same value, it seems like > we could have a macro to change binary float literals to decimal, and also > get 0.1 exact.. > > >> >>> Off-topic: Jeffrey, will your Float128 library be correctly-rounded? >>> >> > -- > Palli. > >
