Hi Paul, To expand a little on what DNF and Ismael are saying is that 1:10, for most purposes, is already an array you can work with:
julia> a = 1:10 1:10 julia> b = 3*a 3:3:30 julia> a[2] 2 In other words, for cases where you think you might want to use "collect(a)", you can probably just use "a" directly. On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 9:59:27 PM UTC+8, Ismael VC wrote: > > What DNF means is that must of the time you don't need to convert a range > into an array, since the range is tolerable. The only times I need to do > that is if I need to slice or index the elements of the range. > > So what are you doing with this range? > El 06/11/2015 07:54, "Paul Analyst" <paul.a...@mail.com <javascript:>> > escribió: > >> Not work _ >> _ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to technical computing >> (_) | (_) (_) | Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org >> _ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "?help" for help. >> | | | | | | |/ _` | | >> | | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 0.4.0 (2015-10-08 06:20 UTC) >> _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | Official http://julialang.org/ release >> |__/ | x86_64-w64-mingw32 >> >> julia> a=1:10 >> 1:10 >> >> julia> >> >> W dniu 2015-11-05 o 18:40, DNF pisze: >> >>> Did you try my suggestion? Just use >>> a = 1:10 >>> >>> Doesn't it work the way you want? >>> >> >>
