thanks!

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 22:40:53 UTC-3, Yichao Yu wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:11 PM, andrew cooke <and...@acooke.org 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > I'd like to be able to use take() and all the other iterator tools with 
> a 
> > stream of data backed by an array (or string). 
> > 
> > By that I mean I'd like to be able to do something like: 
> > 
> >> stream = XXX([1,2,3,4,5]) 
> >> collect(take(stream, 3)) 
> > [1,2,3] 
> >> collect(take(stream, 2)) 
> > [4,5] 
> > 
> > Is this possible?  I can find heavyweight looking streams for IO, and I 
> can 
> > find lightweight iterables without state.  But I can't seem to find the 
> > particular mix described above. 
>
> Jeff's conclusion @ JuliaCon is that it seems impossible to implement 
> this (stateful iterator) currently in a generic and performant way so 
> I doubt you will find it in a generic iterator library (that works not 
> only on arrays). A version that works only on Arrays should be simple 
> enough to implement and doesn't sound useful enough to be in an 
> exported API so I guess you probably should just implement your own. 
>
> Ref 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/julia-users/iterator/julia-users/t4ZieI2_iwI/3NTw1k406qkJ
>  
>
> > 
> > (I think I can see how to write it myself; I'm asking if it already 
> exists - 
> > seems like it should, but I can't find the right words to search for). 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Andrew 
> > 
>

Reply via email to