I feel like sticking them in Colors.jl is fine – if at some point that package gets too big by some metric, we can split it up, but I don't get the impression that we're there yet.
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Gabriel Gellner <gabrielgell...@gmail.com> wrote: > As an end user that would love this, I would prefer a single package. Put > all them tasty, wacky colors in one place! > > On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 14:08:35 UTC-8, Randy Zwitch wrote: >> >> Since the Julia ecosystem is getting bigger, I figured I'd propose this >> here first and see what people think is the right way forward (instead of >> wasting people's time at METADATA) >> >> In the R community, they've created two packages of novelty color >> schemes: Wes Anderson <https://github.com/karthik/wesanderson> and >> Beyonce <https://github.com/dill/beyonce>. While humorous, these color >> palettes are interesting to me and I'd like to make them available in >> Vega.jl (and Julia more broadly). Should I: >> >> 1) Not do it at all....because this is a serious, scientific community! >> 2) Do two separate packages, mimicking R >> 3) Create a single NoveltyColors.jl package, in case there are other >> palettes that come up in the future >> 4) Make a feature request at Colors.jl (really not my favorite choice, >> since there is so much cited research behind the palettes) >> >> I neglected to mention ColorBrewer.jl (which Vega.jl uses), since >> ColorBrewer is a known entity in the plotting community. >> >> What do people think? Note, I'm not looking for anyone to do the work >> (I'll do it), just looking for packaging input. >> >
