Andrew this looks really great.  Thanks for the contribution!

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tim Holy <tim.h...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have long been meaning to get around to making SIUnits type-stable under
> arithmetic. I've only glanced at your code, but it looks like you just
> scratched one big, bad TODO item off my list! Seems like you've included a
> number of other nice features, too (many thanks for the microns support, it
> will make a difference). I'll be excited to play with this.
>
> Best,
> --Tim
>
> On Friday, February 12, 2016 12:23:22 PM Andrew Keller wrote:
> > I'm happy to share a package I wrote for using physical units in Julia,
> > Unitful.jl <https://www.github.com/ajkeller34/Unitful.jl>. Much credit
> and
> > gratitude is due to Keno Fischer for the SIUnits.jl
> > <https://www.github.com/keno/SIUnits.jl> package which served as my
> > inspiration. This is a work in progress, but I think perhaps a
> serviceable
> > one depending on what you're doing.
> >
> > Like SIUnits.jl, this package encodes units in the type signature to
> avoid
> > run-time performance penalties. From there, the implementations diverge.
> > The package is targeted to Julia 0.5 / master, as there are some
> > limitations with how promote_op is used in Julia 0.4 (#13803)
> > <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/13803>. I decided it wasn't
> worth
> > targeting 0.4 if the behavior would be inconsistent.
> >
> > Some highlights include:
> >
> >    - Non-SI units are treated on the same footing as SI units, with only
> a
> >    few exceptions (unit conversion method). Use whatever weird units you
> >    want.
> >    - Support for units like micron / (meter Kelvin), where some of the
> >    units could cancel out but you don't necessarily want them to.
> >    - Support for LinSpace and other Range types. Probably there are still
> >    some glitches to be found, though.
> >    - Support for rational exponents of units.
> >    - Some tests (see these for usage examples).
> >
> > Please see the documentation for a comprehensive discussion, including
> > issues / to do list, as well as how to add your own units, etc.
> > Comments and feedback are welcome.
> >
> > Best,
> > Andrew Keller
>
>

Reply via email to