I have checked the link and read the article. Am I right that the parallel accelerator basically uses C code instead of julia to do the computation? That would be kinda shame dont you think?
Dne pondělí 9. května 2016 7:00:38 UTC+2 Christian Peel napsal(a): > > > The usual solution is to devectorized your code and to use loops (except > for matrix multiplication if you have large matrices). > > I am hopeful that ParallelAccelerator.jl [1][2] or similar projects can > enable fast vectorized Julia code > > [1] https://github.com/IntelLabs/ParallelAccelerator.jl > [2] http://julialang.org/blog/2016/03/parallelaccelerator > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:37 PM, feza <moham...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> I mean the revised script runs just as fast if not a tad faster with the >> latest master as it does on 0.4.5 : ) >> >> >> On Sunday, May 8, 2016 at 5:20:08 PM UTC-4, Patrick Kofod Mogensen wrote: >>> >>> Same as v0.4, or same as before you changed the code? >>> >>> On Sunday, May 8, 2016 at 8:55:00 PM UTC+2, feza wrote: >>>> >>>> roughly the same speed. >>>> >>>> On Sunday, May 8, 2016 at 2:44:19 PM UTC-4, Patrick Kofod Mogensen >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> out of curiosity, what about v0.5? >>>> >>>> > > > -- > chris...@ieee.org <javascript:> >
