If Andrew Ng who cited Gates, and Gates who cited Domingos (who did not lecture at Google with a TensorFlow question in the end), were unsuccessful penny traders, Julia was a language for web design, and the tribes in the video didn't actually solve problems, perhaps this would be a wildly off-topic, speculative discussion. But these statements couldn't be farther from the truth. In fact, if I had known about this video some months ago I would've understood better on how to solve a problem I was working on.
For the founders of Julia: I understand your tribe is mainly CS. This master algorithm, as you are aware, would require collaboration with other tribes. Just citing the obvious. On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 10:21:25 AM UTC-3, Kevin Liu wrote: > > There could be parts missing as Domingos mentions, but induction, > backpropagation, genetic programming, probabilistic inference, and SVMs > working together-- what's speculative about the improved versions of these? > > Julia was made for AI. Isn't it time for a consolidated view on how to > reach it? > > On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:20:35 PM UTC-3, Isaiah wrote: >> >> This is not a forum for wildly off-topic, speculative discussion. >> >> Take this to Reddit, Hacker News, etc. >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Kevin Liu <kvt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am wondering how Julia fits in with the unified tribes >>> >>> mashable.com/2016/06/01/bill-gates-ai-code-conference/#8VmBFjIiYOqJ >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8J4uefCQMc >>> >> >>
