I think maybe I didn't write exactly what I meant to. The expression in my original post should have been a boolean value, I want to mimic an if statement basically. Something of the form:
boolean ? expression_to_eval_if_boolean_is_true Since the ternary operator mimics an if-else statement, it seems strange that you're given a convenient one-line form for an if-else statement, but not for just a straight if statement. Of course you could do if boolean; expression_to_eval_if_boolean_is_true; end but that's a bit clunky compared to the much slicker question-mark syntax. On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 1:11:29 AM UTC-7, Eric Forgy wrote: > > This is already available using '&&' > > expression && do_something >
