(I'm just untangling some confusion on my end. Is the following correct?) In 0.4, array dimensions were printed like this:
julia> zeros(2,3) 2x3 Array{Float64,2}: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 In 0.5, the "x" is replaced with a "×": julia> zeros(2,3) 2×3 Array{Float64,2}: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 but apparently this character isn't a multiplication, but the cross-product operator: julia> 2×3 # copy/paste from above ERROR: MethodError: no method matching cross(::Int64, ::Int64) in eval(::Module, ::Any) at ./boot.jl:234 in macro expansion at ./REPL.jl:92 [inlined] in (::Base.REPL.##1#2{Base.REPL.REPLBackend})() at ./event.jl:46 But to get this character you type `\times`, although 'times' is (according to http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/mathematical-operations/) the name for "*", but this is the symbol for the `cross()` function... So wouldn't it be more logical to report the size of arrays using "by"? julia> zeros(2,3) 2 by 3 Array{Float64,2}: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0