> Since they are mutable (I assume) They are not. They are basically wrappers around a tuple with conveniently defined methods on them to make them act like vectors / matrices. You cannot in Julia store mutable objects inline in an array.
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 1:22:44 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote: > > Awesome, I didn't realise this. I will definitely give them a try (and > possibly eventually report back). It very likely makes more sense for our > application for us to use these than an immutable tuple. Since they are > mutable (I assume), we can pass them as an argument to a function to be > written to (as output). Of course I realise there are many applications > where the immutable tuples are better. > > Bill. > > On 12 August 2016 at 12:12, Kristoffer Carlsson <kcarl...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> They are bitstypes so if you have a vectoe of them they will be stored >> "inline" in the vector. > > >
