On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Cristóvão Duarte Sousa <cris...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Yichao. > > Rereading my first question and reading your second answer I think may have > been not clear in the first one. > In the first question, I wanted to ask not about the current state but > rather about the future goal of the development. > Is your "no" about the current state or are you saying it is not a future > goal at all?
It's "no" in that I don't think anyone is working on it or planning to work on it so it's not part of "current thread support development". We'll likely add that later but the first "stable" version of threading support will unlikely support that. Relevant issues, https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/16134 and (more accurately) https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/17573 > > > On Saturday, October 22, 2016 at 4:37:18 PM UTC+1, Yichao Yu wrote: >> >> >>> Now, let me ask two questions. >>> - Will the current thread support development allow embedding Julia into >>> multiple threads (even if it is as multiple instances)? >> >> >> No. >> >>> >>> - What are my options **today**, if any, to somehow overcome this >>> limitation? >> >> >> You can only call julia runtime/code from a single thread and this is >> unlikely to change until we have non-experimental threading support. How you >> serialize calls to julia code or whether that's feasible is strongly >> application dependent. >> >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> >
