Stefan, I didn't mean to dig up a bone of contention. Please remember what I laid out on the wiki was just a suggestion. I can delete it at any time.
I brought up the suggestion of using the SourceForge wiki for two (2) reasons: [1] Someone suggested the OJ wiki could use a little more structure and organizing. [2] Larry and Peppe were talking about using the wiki for help in OpenJUMP. Having said that, I really don't care which wiki we use. If you feel strongly about staying with the OJ wiki we have now then lets do that! (I agree that any transition of the wiki would be a lot of work.) In this case I think the documentation of OJ functions that Peppe has come up with should stay on the OJ wiki and not be moved to the SourceForge wiki. You wrote: "And hey... please be carefull to start new wiki's and and so on.. consider the time you can work on that first : there are already 2 more OJ wikis, where i consider one as being completely unnecessary, while the second you rather be renamed due to it's rather personal touch." We have three wikis? I can think of only two (2) wikis. One is at http://openjump.org/wiki/show/HomePage and the other is at http://thejumppilotproject.pbwiki.com/. Where is the third? Which wiki would you like to rename? The wiki I have for the JPP? The Sunburned Surveyor On 9/10/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the wiki... > > i am not very happy with the idea of transfering all the stuff of the OJ > wiki to the sourceforge wiki. Only the function-help would i consider so > far. > The point is, that the current wiki is quite established and there is > lots of information on the site. It is further impossible for me to > manage two wikis (or say: i don^t want that!). I also would like to see > at least a split layout into side menu frame and content frame (like the > instiki main page) - but this is not as important as having an > information source. > > what concerns the sourceforge wiki. It is an anlternative, but it comes > with all the sourceforge stuff - i.e. headers. Which i don't like. I > also think, that only sf-members can have write access. > Furthermore i am not really a fan of heaving separates entries for users > and for developers. It makes the overall wiki-structure more unclear and > may lead to doubled efforts, for which we do not have the man power. > > finally.. i would agree with using the sf wiki to describe the OJ > functionality - but therefore it should have currently only one > main-menu item which is "OJ Functionality". This leaves as room for > later improvements. But generally .. as there has been now done a lots > of effort by Peppe on the current wiki - i would even agree to not start > with SF wiki dure to the maintenance efforts for both. > (And hey... please be carefull to start new wiki's and and so on.. > consider the time you can work on that first : there are already 2 more > OJ wikis, where i consider one as being completely unnecessary, while > the second you rather be renamed due to it's rather personal touch) > > my 2cents > stefan > > PS: i may change my mind when Jon will stop providing web space. But we > need also a more "professional" and easy to maintain web site such as > the one QGIS has (i had again a look on xoops - which was used for the > first JPP webpage, but to dive into the setup takes time which i don't > have) > > Giuseppe Aruta schrieb: > > > > > > */Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* ha scritto: > > > > Peppe, > > > > I would like to try and review some your help documentation for > > OpenJUMP functions/menu items. > > > > Do you care if I make these edits directly in the wiki, or should I > > make them in a separate document so you can review them? > > > > What do you think about having me copy the content to the new > > SourceForge JPP Wiki when I am finished with my review? > > > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > > > Landon, > > I answer your letter late since I am working abroad and I cannot see > > my email regularly. > > > > You can directly correct the help documentation on wiki pages. This > > is the fastest way to work, I think. > > Regarding new > > SourceForge JPP Wiki, that probabily is the the natural position of > > the help context. So it is OK to copy it, maybe in the future to move. > > > > > > Peppe > > > > Ciao > > > > Peppe > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/it/taglines/hotmail/nowyoucan/nextgen/*http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
