Hi Stefan, Sextante for Openjump is still available on Sextante page. http://forge.osor.eu/plugins/wiki/index.php?Downloads&id=13&type=g on Binaries - Current stable realize - it is possible to download a unique file (18 mb) which includes GvSIG, Openjump and Geotools bindings of Sextante 0.55. While Binaries - Nightly build has a recent, untested version (0.6, I think). After downloaded any of those version and opened the zip file, you will see some folder: "core" folder store tools files, while "bindings"-"Openjump" store the two fundamental files to use under Openjump. Regards
Peppe --- Mer 26/5/10, Stefan Steiniger <sst...@geo.uzh.ch> ha scritto: > Da: Stefan Steiniger <sst...@geo.uzh.ch> > Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] Thinking about a release at the end of July. > A: "OpenJump develop and use" <jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Data: Mercoledì 26 maggio 2010, 04:15 > not sure. > I can't make promises currently. I was planning to do a bit > of OJ stuff > in June and I would like to see i) Michaels CSV/txt plugin, > some ii) > Pirol grid creation tools, and iii) my recent raster-based > developments > included - i.e. stuff that I did based on the Sextante API > (in > particular converting images to vector grids). But with > respect to what > I have planned and accomplished the last 2 months, I am not > sooo confident. > > I am also still unsure how to keep going with Sextantes > Bindings... i.e. > the problem is that we cannot cast between the classes > transferred to > OpenJUMP now (in a proper package path) and theirs if we > want to use > their libs/functions.. or is that possible? The point is > that the > Sextante Implementation is quite nice for the whole > raster/vector > processing thing, but > a) it has a level of abstraction that we would not need for > working with > OpenJUMP only (so I selected only the raster classes so far > to transfer > them to OJ), and > b) the bindings for OJ are not anymore available for > download on the > sextante page (if I remember correctly), since we should > deliver those > with OpenJUMP in future (a small issue here is also that > Sextante is now > distributed for Java 1.6 while we compile with 1.5). And > believe me - > sextante provides so much functions that we want to support > it. > > just some thoughts, > > stefan > > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > > I've accumulated a list of about 7 or 8 bug fixes I > want to do for > > OpenJUMP. It looks like I may be able to make some > time for this work > > in June and July. I was wondering if we might shoot > for a release of > > OpenJUMP incorporating this work at the end of July. > > > > I've also done some work porting about 4 of my > plug-ins from BizzJUMP > > to OpenJUMP, and I'd like to release them at the same > time. (They will > > be separate plug-ins, and not part of the core.) > > > > If people are agreeable to this idea of a release at > the end of July, > > I will throw up a wiki page on SourceForge where we > can coordinate our > > progress on tasks for the release. > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
