On 10.10.2016 08:43, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > It is only the 41 seconds wait with initial opening. I don't believe that > the lag comes from the ECW/JPEG2000 SDK because it is the same, nor from GDAL > because QGIS opens images fast. We do not have much left and it must be > either ImageIO-ext part or the way how OpenJUMP is discussing with it that > makes opening unnecessary slow. I can see something about JAI in the logs, > and I see also that the GDAL version reserves much more memory. I wonder if > ImageIO is creating pyramid layers or some cache when it loads the image > initially.
i will try to compare both implementations or create a barebone gdal image loader to exclude JAI issues, maybe the lag is something we can fix on our side. > I believe we could now use also the ECW/JP2 SDK version 5.x, but there is one > requirement that OpenJUMP can't probably fulfill at the moment: it should be > able to read also data through the net with ECWP protocol. Otherwise the > EULA, which can be found inside the OJ's gdal extension libraries (at the end > of the ECW5License.rtf) does not look bad: SNIP on the first glance i would agree. are there any other OS softwares according to you're knowledge that already ship these binaries. that would be assuring to know. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
