It is fine, Ede, thanks. SVG export works either with embedded Export view to SVG or with CadPlan print plugin. Everything works if I don't change the output scale (Export view to SVG, scale 1:... for instance, or, using the zoom tols and then export to svg). In these case RasterImageLayer is not export in the proper dimension or it disappear.
I did a test using using a plugin that use JFreeSVG instead of Batik lib to export to SVG and had the same problems os scaling Sextante rasters. To resume: everything works as OJ 1.15 ;-) Peppe Il giorno dom 16 ago 2020 alle ore 18:50 <edgar.sol...@web.de> ha scritto: > done in r6375. to batik 1.6.1 instead of 1.6 though. would you mind > doublechecking that it works as expected again? ..ede > > On 16.08.2020 16:01, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > > I suggest to move back to Batik 1.6 and to keep the option to move either > > to smaller SVG lib or a newer Batik for OpenJUMP JTS+15 > > > > Il giorno dom 16 ago 2020 alle ore 14:47 Michaud Michael < > > m.michael.mich...@orange.fr> ha scritto: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> It would be nice to know exactly what is wrong with batik1.13. > Sometimes, > >> third party libraries just become more strict, > >> > >> and in that case, it can be useful to fix the code on OpenJUMP side > >> whatever the final solution choosen. > >> > >> Michaël > >> > >> envoyé : 16 août 2020 à 14:31 > >> de : edgar.sol...@web.de > >> à : OpenJump develop and use <jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, > >> Giuseppe Aruta <giuseppe.ar...@gmail.com> > >> objet : Re: [JPP-Devel] batik upgraded > >> > >> > >> On 16.08.2020 13:07, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> this issue was not closed: moving to newer batik broke SVG export for > both > >> embedded OpeJUMP "Export view" and CadPlan Printer view plugin. > >> > >> yeah, didn't hear back from you guys. so we are agreed thta i'll roll > back > >> the upgrade to the latest working batik 1.6 . > >> > >> also Peppe is totally right, batik is a big (in terms of space) > dependency > >> for a very small feat (svg export). we should probably change that. > >> > >> ..ede > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > > >
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel