|
Ede, Of course : first, I upgraded jython to the last, not noticing the incredible size difference with our old jython 2.2. Then you let me know that we can use a smaller slim-jython which is "only" 14.4MB instead of 32MB. Finally, I found it not even worth a x 12 size increase (compared to our 1.2MB old jar) as it is somewhat experimental and I even don't know what advantages recent versions have. I did a very small upgrade from 2.2 to 2.2.1, with no noticeable size increase. Of course, if anyone is interested by a newer version to do something that 2.2.1 can't, we can reconsider it. (I did not find a good documentation about the library evolution and why the jar increased this way, but I did not search so much) Michaël
|
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
