[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi,
> My personal preferences are definitely the M/T series, but I also > work with ERX. My current ERX frustration is the incredibly stupid/ > insane/non-intuitive lack of a plain interface description field. iirc this behaviour is a "tribute" to the virtual-router issue. any configuration regarding layer 1+2 depends on the virtual-router default. Any configuration above is in the context of the virtual-router wehrer configured (which can be != default). So you can have ethernet/atm/sonet/...-description per physical interface ... or even per subinterface and extra descriptions per ip-interface ... we're using layer1+2 descriptions for cabling infos and ip descriptions for customers or similar infos. Regards, Olaf _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
