-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The LSP should be re-built unless RSVP has signaled that the path be
torn down.

Of course, a native IPv4 lookup would break if you do not have the
routes on all your routers so sending the traffic using native IPv4
lookups could be entirely pointless.

- --
Leigh


Dermot Williams wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
>  
> 
> I have a quick question about RSVP LSPs that one or more of you might be
> able to answer for me. According to the JNCIS study guide "when an
> established LSP experiences a failure and is torn down, the traffic that
> was transiting the LSP begins to be forwarded using native IPv4 lookups
> in the network."
> 
>  
> 
> It's unclear from this sentence whether or not the LSP will be rebuilt
> using an alternative path or if the router will forward packets using
> the IGP indefinitely (requiring a manual clear in order to get it
> rebuilt). Our experience is that the LSP will be rebuilt over an
> alternative path fairly quickly but to date we have only used them to
> carry Layer 2 VPNs so that may impact the behaviour.
> 
>  
> 
> Could anyone clarify this for me?
> 
>  
> 
> Dermot Williams
> 
>  
> 
> Senior Network Engineer
> 
> Irish Broadband Internet Services
> 
>  
> 
> Mobile:   +353 86 3887961
> 
> DDI:         +353 1 4818481
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Note:
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No 
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If 
> you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all 
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the 
> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, 
> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
> recipient. Irish Broadband and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right 
> to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views 
> expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where 
> the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be 
> the views of any such entity.
>  
> Thank You. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGCQUzZ0chUame06wRAuiqAKDE8er8vwVBbbanmcMAF2RUDN7+RQCggjpq
lh7xjVA7l9QrwEMm3hXPyMA=
=QFla
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to