As a follow up, here is a cisco doc explaining the fact. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/bgp-toc.html
Static Routes and Redistribution You can always use static routes to originate a network or a subnet. The only difference is that BGP considers these routes to have an origin that is incomplete, or unknown. You can accomplish the same result that the example in the Redistribution section accomplished with this: -- Ebben On Thursday 19 April 2007 11:22 am, Borchers, Mark M. wrote: > We have a downstream BGP site announcing 19 prefixes from a Cisco router. > Eleven of the prefixes were configured with network statements in his BGP > config. The remaining nine were statically null-routed and being > redistributed into BGP. Thus, those nine appeared to us on an M20 as > origin incomplete. None were advertised to other peers. > > Just wondering if this is working as designed or if we have a Juniper-Cisco > BGP interoperability issue. We are running Junos 7.6R2.6. I am aware of > the role of origin in BGP path selection, but these examples include routes > that are not being announced via any other path. > > > Mark Borchers > > > > > NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential > information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying > or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this transmission in error, please notify the sender via e-mail. > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Ebben Aries Lead Network Engineer United Communications, Inc. 389 SW Scalehouse Ct. Suite 100 Bend, OR 97702 Office: 541.322.1407 Fax: 541.322.1417 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
