Hey all, I have a working config running on a Cisco 7206 I've inherited. It looks like a TCC between an ATM DS3 PVC and a fast-E VLAN:
---- interface ATM1/0 no ip address atm scrambling cell-payload atm framing cbitplcp no atm ilmi-keepalive no atm enable-ilmi-trap pvc 1/100 l2transport ubr 44209 encapsulation aal5snap interface FastEthernet2/0 description Trunk to switch no ip address duplex full interface FastEthernet2/0.101 encapsulation dot1Q 101 connect foo ATM1/0 1/100 FastEthernet2/0.101 interworking ethernet ------ The ATM PVC is a feed into a VPLS cloud (all IP addressed in a /24). The ethernet VLAN feeds to another router (also with an address in the /24). So ARP and IPv4 packets are getting switched between this ethernet and the VPLS cloud out on the ATM (out of my control). Now, I want to replace this with an M20 with a 4FE PIC and a DS3 ATM PIC. It really seems like I just want a ATM PVC - ethernet TCC: unit 910 { encapsulation vlan-tcc; vlan-id 910; family tcc { proxy { inet-address 10.1.1.1; } remote { inet-address 10.1.1.2; } [...] but in my case, the proxy and remove inet-addresses don't make sense. I need ARP to get passed through the TCC since there's 200 other IPs (remote site routers) on the provider side of the ATM. Do I need to do something like a 2-port VPLS setup locally on my M20 instead (so as to handle the ARP correctly, with multiple IPs out on the ATM)?. That seems like it would work, but then I need a ATM2 DS3 card instead of an ATM1 ($$), and suddenly it becomes cheaper to leave the Cisco in place. Any ideas? -- -Will Orton :: http://www.loopfree.net/ _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp