Nicolaj, that would explain my issue. Thank you. I am open to
suggestions on some form of etherchannel between the cisco and the
juniper, it was my understanding that the juniper and cisco only support
LACP as being the common protocol. Was I wrong in this estimation?
Thanks.. //db
Nicolaj Kamensek wrote:
> Dan Benson wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>> interfaces ae0 vlan-tagging;
>> aggregated-ether-options {
>> link-speed 1g;
>> lacp {
>> active;
>> }
>
> do you have FPC or FPC-E? Active LACP is only possible with the
> enhanced FPC. However, why do you want lacp?
>
> Regards,
> Nico
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
