I have some 140s here and they work well. The older boxes (NS50) have been in production for about two years now and have never had any issues whatsoever.
-- Leigh Peter E. Fry wrote: >> Looking for comments from anyone using the Juniper SSG >> line of security appliances, specifically model 140 or >> 520. We are considering trying one out as a replacement >> for an aging Cisco PIX 520. Most interested in the >> robustness, IPS functionality, etc. Also note that the >> new 520M can run JUNOS, any advantages there? >> > > When I was working with the Netscreen 5200 at work (back > in 2003-2004), I picked up a 5XT for a bit of > extracurricular work. If you're serious about trying before > you buy (and are dying to spend some cash), consider picking > up an SSG 5 for home use. > The SSG 520 would probably be closer to the PIX in form > (similar width; lower, longer, and probably louder), but > with a... tad more performance headroom. The old PIX specs > tended to be a bit... optimistic; I don't know about the new > ASA. In my experience you can take the Juniper performance > specs at face value. > The JUNOS angle is interesting -- the long-rumored union > of JUNOS and ScreenOS would yield a router with superior > security features and a firewall with superior routing > features. > > Peter E. Fry > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp