On the Cisco side, you can establish IETF in many ways. "encapsulation frame-relay ietf" will set a baseline for all PVCs. "frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x yyy ietf" or "frame-relay interface-dlci yyy ietf" will set encapsulation on a per pvc basis.
But yes, you'll need to make the change for that particular pvc(s) connecting to the Juniper box. "show frame-relay pvc" will let you see the encapsulation for each of the PVCs defined. HTH, Scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BRIANT Alain Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 4:02 AM To: Ivan c Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] frame-relay J6350 to Cisco 2611 I am not sure but I believe yes As long as Juniper does only normalized software. As I remember Cisco has a proprietary encapsulation if you type on the cisco side "encapsulation frame-relay" without the IETF keyword. You will also be able to modify the cisco side to remove this keyword if it doesn't work. Alain Ivan c a écrit : >thanks Alain, > >does the "encapsulation frame-relay" give IETF? > >cheers >Ivan > >On 9/13/07, BRIANT Alain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hi Ivan >> >>here is a starting config assuming you are on the serial 1/0/0 >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] show interfaces >>se-1/0/0 { >> dce; >> encapsulation frame-relay; >> serial-options { >> clock-rate 2.048mhz; >> } >> unit 0 { >> dlci 199; >> family inet { >> address 192.168.1.1/30; >> } >> } >>} >> >>You will need the starting "serial-option and clock-rate" only if you >>have a DCE cable (female one and male on the cisco side) In the >>contrary you will need to remove it. >>The DCE statement should be needed as you have a DTE behavior by >>default on the cisco side. >>I'm not sure it will disturb but I would advise you to test first >>without the "crypto map IPSec-con" statement on the cisco side >> >>You will normaly be able to ping from one side to the other one Good >>tests regards Alain >> >> >> >> >>Ivan c a écrit : >> >> >> >>>Hi All, >>> >>>Looking for a little help with a frame-relay connection between a >>>Cisco 2611 and a Juniper J6350. >>> >>>This is the serial interface on the J6350, which I hope can play >>>frame-relay with IETF? >>>http://www.juniper.net/products/jseries/dsheet/100116.pdf >>> >>> >>>This is the Cisco 2611 side of the equation, which is currently >>>working to a Cisco 7206 which is getting swapped out for the J6350 >>> >>>interface Serial0/0 >>>mtu 1550 >>>no ip address >>>encapsulation frame-relay IETF >>>load-interval 30 >>>no fair-queue >>>frame-relay traffic-shaping >>>! >>>interface Serial0/0.199 point-to-point >>>ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252 >>>frame-relay interface-dlci 199 >>>crypto map IPSec-con >>> >>>any ideas for the Juniper side of the equation would be much appreciated. >>> >>>thanks >>>Ivan >>>_______________________________________________ >>>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
