On 31/10/2007, Farhan Jaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) What is the usual practice of providers while using L2VPN, will this > small range of VLAN Ids enough for them? OR there are other techniques?
In our case, we just treat L2VPNs as transparent, and let the customer send whatever they want. Tagged, untagged, whatever. We use ethernet-ccc encapsulation for this, of course. We have yet to come up with a situation where we needed to care about VLANs for L2VPN customers (unless we need to q-in-q them across a trunk port from an aggregation device, in which case 512 would still be plenty per-trunk port for us). David _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
